I would love for this to win, and I hope it rakes in many votes. However, I'm afraid that certain ("flashier"? "crowd-favorite"?) entries will cause a kind of bias for this election.
When future contests are held, imagine having MORE THAN A SINGLE VOTE to spend! Maybe if you could vote for 4 or 5 entries, perhaps with a sequential-preference-grade (Rank#1 = most favorite; Rank#2 = next favorite; etc), then it could paint (no, not paint! -- we DRAW here in vectorland) a more honest picture for how the "seemingly-less-popular" entry ACTUALLY performs.
It might be the only way for some entries to have a more honest and well-earned chance of succeeding. And rightfully so, because here's an example: Let's say that a "popular" image takes a whopping 40% of the vote as Rank#1. However, a quieter entry scores quite well with 65% voting it as Rank#4.
Those kinds of numbers give a better breakdown/overview of how pieces are actually received by viewers, and it gives the underdog an actual, well-deserved shot at being a contender.
Otherwise, in a “Winner-Takes-All” ruling, some of those "actually-favored" pieces will slip through cracks, perhaps snagging only a handful of votes (when truthfully, it actually had a support-base of 65%)!
Bitte melde Dich an, um einen Kommentar zu verfassen!
Hi Olibia
Thank you for your great submission.
Tim
Very nice Olibia!
What about moving the 1.0 to the right of "INKSCAPE". I think that having less lines would make it even nicer.
Love this!
One of the best designs posted
I would love for this to win, and I hope it rakes in many votes. However, I'm afraid that certain ("flashier"? "crowd-favorite"?) entries will cause a kind of bias for this election.
When future contests are held, imagine having MORE THAN A SINGLE VOTE to spend! Maybe if you could vote for 4 or 5 entries, perhaps with a sequential-preference-grade (Rank#1 = most favorite; Rank#2 = next favorite; etc), then it could paint (no, not paint! -- we DRAW here in vectorland) a more honest picture for how the "seemingly-less-popular" entry ACTUALLY performs.
It might be the only way for some entries to have a more honest and well-earned chance of succeeding. And rightfully so, because here's an example: Let's say that a "popular" image takes a whopping 40% of the vote as Rank#1. However, a quieter entry scores quite well with 65% voting it as Rank#4.
Those kinds of numbers give a better breakdown/overview of how pieces are actually received by viewers, and it gives the underdog an actual, well-deserved shot at being a contender.
Otherwise, in a “Winner-Takes-All” ruling, some of those "actually-favored" pieces will slip through cracks, perhaps snagging only a handful of votes (when truthfully, it actually had a support-base of 65%)!